Charlie Kirk's Legacy: Battling Bullshit with Clarity – And How KillingJargon.com Joins the Fight
- JargonHater
- Sep 24
- 3 min read
Listen up, rebels: in the shitstorm of headlines that never ends, the assassination of Charlie Kirk hits like a gut punch. I had seen a lot of Charlie's videos of campus rallies. Compelling! I had seen him on television, heard him on radio, etc. His mind worked so quickly. His intellect was astounding. His faith? Uncompromising. I'm just a 61-year-old guy trying to understand the world in which we currently live, and the young generation that I feel needs direction. I've watched Charlie brilliantly confront this generation with the phrase "Change My Mind." Many failed. Many changed THEIR minds.
The guy who built Turning Point USA into a juggernaut of campus rallies and no-holds-barred speaking gigs? Gone. It's a raw, senseless loss, and I'm not here to gawk or grind an axe on tragedy. No, this post isn't about capitalizing on Charlie's death—fuck that noise. It's about the clarity it slammed into me like a brick to the face: what I've been fumbling with on KillingJargon.com is exactly what Charlie was mastering. Battling the bullshit jargon that chokes real conversation, armed with nothing but common sense and a willingness to call it out.
Charlie didn't just rant; he wielded the Socratic Method like a goddamn lightsaber. Remember those campus showdowns where he'd slice through the word salad of "systemic inequities" or "equity initiatives" with questions that forced the jargon-spewers to squirm? "What does that actually mean?" he'd ask, not with malice, but with the blunt force of someone who knew words were weapons—and empty ones were just loading the chamber with blanks. Turning Point USA isn't about screaming into the void; it is about respectful discourse, dragging the conversation back to plain English where ideas can actually breathe. No buzzword smoke screens. No "facilitating meaningful dialogue" crap to hide behind. Just common sense, one Socratic jab at a time.
And that's the epiphany that hit me in the gut this week. KillingJargon.com? It's been a chaotic guillotine swing at corporate drivel, but Charlie's work sharpened the blade for me. I've been chopping "synergy" and "leverage" with snark, but now I see the bigger fight: using that same relentless clarity to foster discourse that cuts through the noise. Not to win arguments, but to expose the emptiness of the language that's poisoning them. Jargon isn't just annoying—it's a shield for bad ideas, a way to sound smart while saying nothing. Charlie knew that, and his rallies weren't echo chambers; they were arenas where the bullshit got called out, respectfully but unapologetically. That's the foundation I want for KillingJargon.com going forward: a space to battle jargon with common sense, Socratic-style. Ask the hard questions, slay the words that deserve it, and build conversations that actually mean something.
Charlie's death doesn't change the mission—it clarifies it. He was out there, on the front lines, guillotining the word vomit that keeps us divided and dumbed down. Now, more than ever, we need that fight. KillingJargon.com isn't about politics or sides (I will equally battle both); it's about reclaiming language from the suits and the spinners who use it to confuse and control. Let's honor that by keeping it real, keeping it respectful, and keeping the blade sharp.
So, rebels, let's do this. Submit your jargon examples—the buzzwords, the soundbites, the phrases that make you want to scream, and the arguments on issues that need to be discussed. And tell us how to eliminate them: what plain-English swap would you use? Drop it on the Buzzword Butcher page, and let's build an arsenal of common sense together.
#KillJargon – for Charlie, for clarity, for the fight.
Let's Kill Jargon Together!
Comments